Commentary for Bava Batra 341:9

והא רבי יהודה נמי בזה קאמר

and is valid.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to R. Judah, any postdated deed is valid even though the contents do not show that it was postdated; much more so in this case where it is obvious (cf. p. 748 n. 16) that it was postdated. ');">²²</span> So R. Judah. R. Jose [declares it to be] invalid.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. explanation in the Gemara, infra. ');">²³</span> Said R. Judah to him: Was not [such<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., postdated. ');">²⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Batra 341:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.